Buy new:
-16% $32.11$32.11
$3.99 delivery April 7 - 8
Ships from: AnaCo Sold by: AnaCo
Save with Used - Very Good
$19.95$19.95
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: NT STORE LLC

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Ties That Bound: Founding First Ladies and Slaves Hardcover – Illustrated, April 6, 2017
Purchase options and add-ons
Unlike other histories that treat the stories of the First Ladies’ slaves as separate from the lives of their mistresses, Ties That Bound closely examines the relationships that developed between the First Ladies and their slaves. For elite women and their families, slaves were more than an agricultural workforce; slavery was an entire domestic way of life that reflected and reinforced their status. In many cases slaves were more constant companions to the white women of the household than were their husbands and sons, who often traveled or were at war. By looking closely at the complicated intimacy these women shared, Schwartz is able to reveal how they negotiated their roles, illuminating much about the lives of slaves themselves, as well as class, race, and gender in early America.
By detailing the prevalence and prominence of slaves in the daily lives of women who helped shape the country, Schwartz makes it clear that it is impossible to honestly tell the stories of these women while ignoring their slaves. She asks us to consider anew the embedded power of slavery in the very earliest conception of American politics, society, and everyday domestic routines.
- Print length416 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
- Publication dateApril 6, 2017
- Dimensions9 x 6.3 x 1.3 inches
- ISBN-10022614755X
- ISBN-13978-0226147550
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Editorial Reviews
Review
“An inventive, integrated portrait of black and white. . . . Her fierce research is distilled into engaging prose. . . . Secrets and lies ensnared these braided lives, and Ties That Bound offers vivid insight into these entangled stories.” ― Times Higher Education
“Both general readers and scholars will benefit by having their knowledge rather uncomfortably enhanced by this substantive study. Highly recommended.” ― Choice
“Ties That Bound provides enlightening depictions of both the savvy that aristocratic women utilized to achieve as much power as their husbands did (even though it was a different kind of power), as well as the disheartening distractions from self-empowerment that these women had to negotiate. . .Schwartz’s expertise clearly shines when she is analyzing the various ways that both black female slaves and white female aristocrats negotiated the man’s world of early nineteenth-century America. . . .A fine and worthy contribution to intersectional studies.” ― H-Net
“Ties That Bound's most important contribution is refocusing our attention on First Ladies as slaveholders and revealing how slaveholding influenced their roles. . . .This book deserves a wide readership.” ― Journal of Southern History
“In Ties That Bound, Schwartz provides a necessary corrective to the popular and scholarly literature on the First Ladies, accounts that tend to focus on their roles as fashionable hostesses. In this fascinating study, Schwartz shows how deeply slavery was embedded in the Founders’ households and explores in exquisite detail the fraught relationships between these Patriot mistresses and the men and women and adults and children whose labor they commanded. A lively and insightful book that complements—and at times contradicts—works glorifying the Founding Fathers and their wives and (white) daughters.” -- Jacqueline Jones, author of A Dreadful Deceit: The Myth of Race from the Colonial Era to Obama's America
"Fascinating. . . . A thought-provoking explication of the thorny personal relationships between slaveholding and enslaved women, and Schwartz succeeds in depicting these relationships 'as a lived experience'." ― Virginia Magazine
"Many books have been written about America’s First Ladies over the last several decades, but for the most part they have addressed only tangentially the issue of slavery. In Ties that Bound: Founding First Ladies and Slaves, historian Marie Jenkins Schwartz
corrects that significant omission. . . . Schwartz is a fluid writer who provides rich details about the daily lives of this
group of Founding First Ladies and the enslaved people who made their privileged lifestyles possible and with whom they interacted on a daily basis. . . . The book is a solid synthesis that enlarges our understanding of gender, class, race, and the institution of slavery in the early republic." ― North Carolina Historical Review
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Ties That Bound
Founding First Ladies and Slaves
By Marie Jenkins SchwartzThe University of Chicago Press
Copyright © 2017 Marie Jenkins SchwartzAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-226-14755-0
Contents
Author's Note,Introduction: Seen and Unseen,
Part 1 Washington,
1 The Widow Washington,
2 Martha Dandridge,
3 Married Lady,
4 Mistress of Mount Vernon,
5 Revolutionary War,
6 First Lady,
7 Slaves in the President's House,
8 Home Again,
Part 2 Jefferson,
9 Martha Wayles,
10 Mistress of Monticello I,
11 War in Virginia,
12 Birth and Death at Monticello,
13 Patsy Jefferson and Sally Hemings,
14 First Lady,
15 Mistress of Monticello II,
16 The Hemingses,
17 Death of Thomas Jefferson,
Part 3 Madison,
18 Dolley Payne,
19 Mrs. Madison,
20 First Lady,
21 Mistress of Montpelier,
22 Decline of Montpelier,
23 The Widow Madison,
24 Sale of Montpelier,
25 In Washington,
26 Death of Dolley Madison,
Epilogue: Inside and Outside,
Acknowledgments,
Notes,
Index,
CHAPTER 1
The Widow Washington
After her husband's death, Martha Washington closed the second-floor bedroom they had shared for decades and moved to one on the floor above. From the window in her garret chamber, she could see parts of Mount Vernon not seen by visitors to the ornate red-roofed mansion. Walls, fences, and shrubbery concealed the areas where slaves labored to provide the mansion's residents with the accoutrements of gentry life, but Martha knew these spaces well. As mistress of Mount Vernon, she supervised the work done there.
The former First Lady presided over a complicated household with a large enslaved staff, from the footman who greeted arriving guests in the impressive elliptical driveway to the scullery maids who washed dishes in a small room above the kitchen. Martha oversaw the gardeners toiling just beyond the kitchen and the cooks they supplied with vegetables. She supervised the work of dairymaids. She kept track of the perishables stored in the larder and the meat that hung in the smokehouse. From an outbuilding on the plantation's North Lane, she distributed fibers to enslaved women who spun them into thread. She oversaw the weaving of thread into cloth and the sewing of cloth into garments and household goods. From her window, she could watch the laundresses boiling wash water and hanging clothes to dry. When she entertained many overnight guests at once, Martha might have her seamstresses embroider owners' initials on items of clothing to ensure they did not get mixed up in the laundry.
Inside the mansion, Martha directed the work of parlor maids and dining room waiters. She summoned and supervised the slaves who waited on family and guests, including her lady's maid, who came upstairs to help her dress, do her hair, and sew. When she was not overseeing her domestic help directly, she inspected the results of their labor. She made sure the bedchambers and linens were clean, the staircases polished, the floors swept and washed — passing judgment and giving directions for improvement.
Except for her move to the third floor, Martha's daily routine did not change all that much following her husband's death. While George Washington lived, visitors flocked to Mount Vernon, hoping to engage him in conversation or bask in his presence. After he died, people continued to come, to pay tribute or forge some link to the history he had helped set in motion. Some came specifically to see his widow, who was as well known as her husband. Martha welcomed the vast numbers of strangers, neighbors, friends, and family, though it meant herdomestic duties continued apace. Yet despite the appearance of continuity, Martha knew great change was in store for Mount Vernon.
A patriarch's death not only represented a personal loss but triggered a financial reckoning. Martha was determined to protect her family's standing. She and George had worked hard to rise economically, socially, and politically, and she was determined to ensure that her heirs would maintain elite status. She was most concerned with her grandchildren, especially the two she and George had raised from infancy. Family was important to Martha despite — or perhaps because of — the many losses she had endured. By the time she married George in 1759, she had already buried one husband, a son, and a daughter. Two other children from her first marriage, to Daniel Parke Custis, had died since her move to Mount Vernon. Martha Parke Custis (Patsy) had passed away at the age of seventeen; John Parke Custis (Jacky) died at twenty-seven. Jacky left behind four young children, two of whom Martha and George Washington raised as their own. George Washington Parke Custis (known as Wash) was age eighteen when his adoptive grandfather died, and twenty-year-old Eleanor Parke Custis (called Nelly) had recently given birth to a daughter, giving Martha yet another generation of loved ones to consider. Martha understood that slavery supported the economic, social, and political world in which she and her grandchildren lived, and her handling of her husband's affairs shows that she accepted this reality. Her goals and values differed in important ways from those of her husband. He had been concerned about the fate of Mount Vernon's slaves and had devised a plan to free some of them after his demise. She too was concerned about the slaves, but she focused mainly on how to prevent her husband's plan from adversely affecting her and her grandchildren.
Martha was present in the second-floor bedroom on the cold day in December 1799 when George Washington lay dying from what was probably a bacterial infection. So were a number of slaves. The maids Caroline, Charlotte, and Molly (sometimes called Moll) were in attendance, as was George's valet, Christopher Sheels, who stood vigil for hours until George indicated that the young man could sit down. The other onlookers who remained with the retired President throughout the day and into the night were George's former secretary Tobias Lear, who happened to be visiting, and his longtime physician, James Craik.
The free white housekeeper Eleanor Forbes was in and out of the bedroom throughout the day and evening, and other slaves were in the house or on the grounds. One had been sent, at George's request, to fetch overseer George Rawlins, who knew how to bleed a patient. He came, and over Martha's objections made an incision, extracting half a pint of blood before Martha prevailed upon George to halt the procedure. Physicians at the time believed medical measures should produce a dramatic result, such as fainting, and before the afternoon was over, other doctors would bleed the President three more times. (Two other physicians had been called to consult with Dr. Craik, one at Martha's request and the other at Craik's.) In addition to bloodletting and other measures, the doctors gave their patient calomel, a mercury compound then used as a purgative but today classified as a fungicide and insecticide.
Wash happened to be away, but Nelly and her newborn, Frances Parke Lewis (called Parke), were at Mount Vernon. She and her husband, a nephew of George Washington, had been helping George and Martha host their many visitors. Nelly apparently did not visit her adoptive father's deathbed to say goodbye. It is possible the men who recorded the surviving firsthand accounts simply did not note her presence. More likely, though, she was observing strictly the rules of confinement and stayed away. Like other new mothers from elite families, Nelly limited her activities to the bedchamber and nursery for about a month following her daughter's birth. Family members, servants, and the doctors would have kept her apprised of changes in the President's condition.
George Washington died at the age of sixty-nine surrounded by people he knew well. A crowded death chamber was not unusual at the time. Elite Virginians expected important social relationships to be represented. Close kin, doctors and their helpers, neighbors, clergy, and important household staff were often present. Everyone understood the social importance of the occasion, especially for a man like George Washington. News of his passing would spread quickly, including details of the death scene. The enslaved people were there presumably to fetch whatever household items might be needed, to carry messages, and to make the patient as comfortable as possible by changing sheets and doing the grubby work of nursing. One of them — or perhaps another slave working in the kitchen — would have prepared one of Martha's home remedies for a sore throat: molasses mixed with vinegar and butter.
Enslaved help not only cared for the patient but served the pageantry of the moment. Their presence was a reminder of their owner's mastery and symbolized an important part of his life's work, as did the presence of Lear, his former secretary. Citizens who heard about the President's death would deem it fitting that such assistants were with him at the end.
The slaves had reasons for wanting to be present. A slaveholder's death held danger — the division of an estate among heirs could separate families held in bondage — but also grounds for hope. At times owners manumitted bonded men and women, particularly favored slaves who worked in the intimate setting of the home. Heirs took deathbed declarations seriously. They would be hard-pressed to go against wishes expressed by loved ones ready to meet their maker — whether the wishes concerned emancipating slaves, bequeathing property, or anything else. Deathbed pronouncements were heard by witnesses, some of whom gathered expressly for this purpose. In George Washington's case, rumors of freedom for slaves at his death had circulated for years, and the four people who served him in his final moments may have hoped to be rewarded with release from service.
At some point in the afternoon of December 14, George sent Martha downstairs to his study to retrieve two wills he had written. After looking them over, he indicated that she should throw one in the fire, which she did. By then it was clear to Martha and others in the room that the President was dying. Through the afternoon, he seemed to accept his impending death with stoicism, asking at intervals for the time. Around five or six o'clock he asked that heroic treatments to save his life be stopped. He struggled for breath and said little. In the evening he told his doctor that he could "feel myself going" and asked that he be allowed to "go off quietly." He died between ten and eleven o'clock, shortly after taking his own pulse and asking to be "decently buried" but not before three days had passed. The request apparently reflected his fear of being interred alive. The dread was widespread in the era, and burial services were often postponed accordingly.
It was not the first time George had thought about what would happen to his body. His will specifically rejected the idea that the public be involved in laying him to rest. "It is my express desire that my Corpse may be Interred in a private manner, without — parade, or funeral Oration," he wrote. He wanted his remains laid "with those of my deceased relatives" in a new vault to be built of brick on the mansion grounds. The old one, also located near the mansion house, was too small, "improperly situated," and in need of repair.
If the President's will had been limited to such mundane matters, it might not have garnered much attention, but one provision posed a problem for Martha and electrified the nation. The will he kept from the fire emancipated his slaves upon Martha's (not his) death. No one recorded George's parting words to Martha, if he had any. His secretary and doctor were the only people in the room who wrote about the President's death, and a later memoir by Wash, who was not present but recounted stories passed down in the family, made no mention of any words that passed between them. After George passed, Martha is reported to have said, "All is now over. I shall soon follow him. ... I have no more trials to pass through." Her words would prove untrue. George's will left Martha with a dilemma: what to do about his slaves?
The writing of a will was one of the rituals that surrounded death, particularly for wealthy white men, and the reading of the will was part of the pageantry and eventually part of the public memory of the man. George crafted his will carefully, attempting to shape the way he would be remembered. Through his will, he did much more than divide his land and stocks. He distributed swords and mourning rings, as well as canes, a Bible, and pistols imbued with historical significance. He publicly affirmed his most important family relationships and friendships through the bequest of personal and prized belongings, as well as through words. Nelly and Wash, for example, received not only land and other property but reassurance that their step-grandfather regarded them "in the same light as I do my own relations."
Through George Washington's will, his slaves received the right to their own persons — eventually, after Martha's passing. He made an exception for one slave, the only one mentioned by name: William Lee, who had been at his master's side through war and peace and who was now disabled. The will granted Lee "immediate freedom" and the right to decide whether to leave or stay at Mount Vernon. Either way, he was to receive an annuity of thirty dollars. Thus, through his bequests, Washington distinguished not only between family, friend, and slave but also among those in each category. Just as some family members and friends were closer than others, so too was one slave.
No one knows the content of the discarded will, although some have speculated that it had been written shortly before Washington took command of the Continental Army in 1775. The surviving one was written in his hand and signed in July 1799. It eventually freed 123 of the 316 slaves who lived and worked on his five farms. The remaining slaves belonged to others. Some had been rented along with a tract of land, but most were part of the estate Martha had inherited from her first husband, the wealthy and well-connected Daniel Parke Custis, who died in 1757. Under Virginia law, Daniel's children or their heirs would eventually take possession of his vast slave and land holdings, as well as other property, but the law also directed that one-third of the estate be allocated for Martha's use over her lifetime. The bulk of Daniel's estate had already been distributed to Jacky's descendants, but Martha's so-called widow's third, or dower property, remained under George's control — as was customary.
The presence of Custis slaves on Washington land complicated the process of emancipating George's slaves. While most of the Custis slaves lived and worked on Custis lands, Martha had brought a dozen or more house servants with her to Mount Vernon in 1759 when she married George, and other Custis slaves had been scattered about on George's four working farms, depending on his need for labor. Custis and Washington slaves formed friendships. They fell in love and married. Children were born, who in turn grew up and had children of their own. By the time of George Washington's death, friendship as well as kinship ties between Washington and Custis slaves were long established.
Shortly before writing his last will, George made lists of the slaves under his management. For each, he recorded name, occupation, place of residence, and name of spouse, if any. He also recorded who owned each slave. Seventy slaves were living at the Mansion House farm. Some were his; others were Martha's. The carpenter Joe was married to Dolshy, a spinner. Joe belonged to George; Dolshy was part of the Custis estate. George's wagoner Godfrey was married to the dower house slave Mima. His carpenter James Carter was married to the knitter Alla, also a dower slave. And so it went. The existence of children only added to the problem. A child's opportunity for freedom depended on whether his or her mother was a Washington or Custis slave. The tangled relationships revealed in the inventories must have weighed heavily on George's mind as he pondered the best way to free his people.
The master of Mount Vernon surely knew that relationships between the Washington and Custis slaves would unravel when his will was implemented. Although George managed the Custis slaves, he had made no plans to free them. He had authority to manumit only those people he had inherited or purchased, along with the children born to enslaved Washington women. He had tried to negotiate with members of the Custis family over some of the others, and the four household servants who attended the dying President — dower slaves all — must have hoped they would be among the Mount Vernon slaves that rumors said would gain freedom at the master's death. But when the content of George's will was made known, it became clear that they would not be freed. Because Custis slaves outnumbered the Washington slaves, most of the enslaved people living at Mount Vernon would remain in bondage.
Martha would have to decide how to carry out the terms of George's will, but first she had to attend to his funeral. As George had requested, burial was delayed until the fourth day after his passing, but little else was as he had hoped. On 18 December 1799 he was interred in the old family vault near the mansion. Martha had arranged for a new door to be placed on the vault, probably at the same time she ordered his coffin from a cabinetmaker in nearby Alexandria, but no new resting place was erected until 1835.
Most elites at this time buried loved ones at home. Home services were not necessarily simple but could involve elaborate meals, liturgies, and sermons, as well as interment. In George's case, eight slaves, all but one a dower slave, played visible roles. House servants Cyrus and Wilson led the President's horse, saddled but riderless, in a funeral procession. About two hundred family members, friends, and household employees joined the cortège that accompanied the body to the family vault, where the Order of Burial from the Episcopal Prayer Book was read.
(Continues...)Excerpted from Ties That Bound by Marie Jenkins Schwartz. Copyright © 2017 Marie Jenkins Schwartz. Excerpted by permission of The University of Chicago Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : University of Chicago Press; Illustrated edition (April 6, 2017)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 022614755X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0226147550
- Item Weight : 1.58 pounds
- Dimensions : 9 x 6.3 x 1.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,106,185 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #878 in American Revolution Biographies (Books)
- #1,878 in Black & African American History (Books)
- #2,270 in US Presidents
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Marie Jenkins Schwartz is an independent author and historian who writes about American women, families, and slavery. She is the recipient of two fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities and other awards, including the Julia Cherry Spruill Publication Prize for Best Book in Southern Women’s History given by the Southern Association for Women Historians. She earned a Ph.D. from the University of Maryland, College Park, and currently holds the position of professor emeritus of history at the University of Rhode Island, where she taught for more than twenty years. Schwartz enjoys speaking about her books and her approach to research and writing. Recently, she has engaged audiences at George Washington’s Mount Vernon, the 92nd Street Y in New York, the Ocean State Writing Conference at the University of Rhode Island, the David Library of the American Revolution in Washington Crossing, PA, and the National Archives in Washington, DC.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2017The book was accurately described and it arrived on time. In transit the book and dust jacket were undamaged. I'm happy.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2019I read this book primarily to update my own book "George Washington's Liberty Key," especially in light of criticism in some quarters as to how Washington attempted to free his slaves. I thought the book did a wonderful job of explaining the constraints laid on by the color-line social contract between owners and slaves, constraints which came from not only family members (differing views of presidents Washington, Jefferson, Madison, their respective, surviving first ladies, and other relatives), but communities, states, and even other countries. One comes to understand how virtually everything related to manumission or granting freedom to slaves was easier said than done. The author gave many supporting examples based on surviving letters; in other cases, implied logic chains and Sherlock-Holmesian deduction were brought to bear to allow one to fairly comprehend the complexities and nuances of how things happened.
In my particular area of interest (Washington), I learned how George arrived at his will and the manner in which he freed his slaves, how Martha, though generally following George's will, had her own, diverging ideas, how her children and grandchildren had theirs, and how Martha's great-granddaughter wound up marrying Robert E. Lee, the man who martially championed the cause of states' rights and slavery while dividing the Union, which George had seen as the prime enabler of freedom. BTW, I have elsewhere learned that while George is said to have opined to Edmund Randolph that should a civil war come because of divisions over slavery, he would move to the northern part of the country. Of course, as is often said, Lee was not Washington and chose his own, differing path, dramatically illustrating the practical difficulties of implementing Washington's preferred choice of universal freedom.
In the case of Jefferson and Sally Hemings, one learns that Virginia law proclaimed that people with no more than one black grandparent (and three white grandparents) were NOT black. This, however, was complicated, as it obviously led to "white" people such as Sally being enslaved. Jefferson and his daughter (first lady) Patsy helped finesse this relationship, unofficially granting freedom to Sally's children, who were by any definition not only white but resembling Jefferson. Officially granting freedom would have confirmed the politically damaging suspicions that Jefferson had carried on the affair with his slave Sally after his wife Martha's death. To some extent, the affair was natural, given that Sally resembled her half-sister Martha, and that Martha had gotten Tom to pledge he wouldn't remarry. Supposed relationship-denial falsehoods were concocted and spread by the Jefferson family after Thomas' death so as to put the whole problem behind them. At any rate, the author offers DNA analysis and convincing argument to support her views.
In the case of Dolley Madison, one learns how one circumstance of high living after another, while in the face of rising expenses and declining revenues, led to the "impossibility" of Dolley making good on James' desire to have their slaves freed. Willful negligence for a lady who was brought up to be a slavery-hating Quaker?
While one mulls the more or less grand concepts of freedom covered in the above paragraphs, one also learns interesting details about how masters and mistresses (but primarily mistresses in the form of founding first ladies) dealt with their slaves and the ties that bound them in various settings: farms, kitchens, wartimes, etc. And speaking of details, if the author revises her book, I would suggest correcting several errors of detail: 1. page 18. Washington was 67, not 69, when he died. 2. page 56. Mount Vernon claims its mansion has twenty-one rooms, not twenty.
Bottom-line with everything considered, I highly recommend this book! Well done!
Check out one of my own books: George Washington's Liberty Key: Mount Vernon's Bastille Key – the Mystery and Magic of Its Body, Mind, and Soul, a best seller at Mount Vernon.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2018This author did a magnificent job of recreating life for the first 3 presidents, their wives and most importantly their slaves. If you enjoy history without a text book style this is the one for you. I learned so much of what the slaves did for their owners and at time I was totally appalled with the tasks they had to perform for the gentry. It was very obvious that the rich would not have known how to function without them. It was upsetting to read at times and horrified with the treatment. If you enjoy social history, you will learn so much about the slaves and the gentry. This book is easy to read but you want to take your time because of what you are learning about our country. I applaud this author.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2017Fascinating and very eye-opening. This book is so timely now with the popularity of Hamilton. My 11 year old just asked me, "Was George Washington good to his slaves?" and because I'd just read this book, I was able to give her a much more nuanced and historically accurate answer. I have never seen a book that tackles this era of our country's founding from quite this perspective, of the entwined lives and fates of the slaves and the wealthy elites who were the founding families. Read this book and you'll never look at Dolley Madison, Martha Washington et al the same way again.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2017Repetitive and preachy regarding the lack of recognition and injustices inflicted upon enslaved people by history, but it is a bit of a consciousness raiser because of the detailed descriptions of the close relationships between mistresses, masters and slaves.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2018The author not only jumps to broad conclusions using primarily secondary sources but some of the basic facts about the historic characters are incorrect. Her use of 19th century terminology to describe the 18th century is not only incorrect but highlights her lack of understanding of the 18th century. While I think the subject matter is one that needs to be explored, this is not the book to base a scholarly opinion of these women on.
Top reviews from other countries
- A. ThompsonReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 14, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Gripping.
One of my favourite books; a very moving and at the same time an extremely upsetting read regarding the truth and the history of slavery and it's deeply rooted connections to America's revered Founding Fathers.